<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dispatches From A Second Year Teacher: The three words every teacher hates to hear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/</link>
	<description>Real Talk From Real Teachers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-2492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as a teacher I also see brillant students being challenged to stretch their thinking. We need to step away from this view that students are learning when they are listening. Instead we need to engage, discuss, move, challenge, and have fun. 
I know when I go to trainings and am expected to sit and listen, my mind wanders after about 5 minutes. I tap my pencil, fold little pieces of paper into origami masterpieces, take several bathroom breaks, write notes to my colleagues-- I turn into my students. However; at workshops, interacting in small groups, my ideas may be challenged, expanded on, and discussed. I am interested, focused, and even though not always on-task, I am learning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a teacher I also see brillant students being challenged to stretch their thinking. We need to step away from this view that students are learning when they are listening. Instead we need to engage, discuss, move, challenge, and have fun.<br />
I know when I go to trainings and am expected to sit and listen, my mind wanders after about 5 minutes. I tap my pencil, fold little pieces of paper into origami masterpieces, take several bathroom breaks, write notes to my colleagues&#8211; I turn into my students. However; at workshops, interacting in small groups, my ideas may be challenged, expanded on, and discussed. I am interested, focused, and even though not always on-task, I am learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss R.</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miss R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-2489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m am a student teacher right now and I&#039;m saddened by what I have been seeing in classrooms.  I am seeing brilliant students being belittled by bureaucrats that evaluate them on a narrow scale of achievement.  I don&#039;t know if I can be a part of this system.  I&#039;ve been having trouble sleeping and eating because I am so upset by how students are treated.  Why are we forcing this useless information on them?  Why are we separating them from the rest of society for 12+ years?  I&#039;m considering just dropping out.  I have no money and no plan b...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m am a student teacher right now and I&#8217;m saddened by what I have been seeing in classrooms.  I am seeing brilliant students being belittled by bureaucrats that evaluate them on a narrow scale of achievement.  I don&#8217;t know if I can be a part of this system.  I&#8217;ve been having trouble sleeping and eating because I am so upset by how students are treated.  Why are we forcing this useless information on them?  Why are we separating them from the rest of society for 12+ years?  I&#8217;m considering just dropping out.  I have no money and no plan b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year I taught Tom Sawyer to my 8th grade LA/SS classes.  One of the most obv. themes is the hypocrisy of social institutions.  Twain satirizes the church, medicine, law and schools-- drawing attention in a uniquely pedantic, insanely boring chapter that drones on and on detailing the curriculum of the particular 19th cent. small town school.  You read the chapter and think, where the hell did that come from? and what does it have to do with the adventurous lives of these little guys?  Then it dawns on you that, in all his cleverness, Twain&#039;s point is just that.  We as a class laugh at the chapter, feel sorry for those poor kids and their anachronistic schooling.  And as an enthusiastic second year teacher myself, I have to ask myself how much things have truly changed in the 150+yrs since ...Moreover, I wonder if I&#039;m teaching the concept of hypocrisy while simultaneously highlighting my own.  

Next week we begin To Kill a Mockingbird and the US Constitution and I plan to bring the issue of gay marriage into the discussion.  But I, in my capacity as a teacher, am essentially not allowed to comment directly on the obvious bigotry and (in my mind) unconstitutionality of One Man One Woman (OR)/Prop 8 (CA)...  Yes, I can draw parallels and lead them to draw their own conclusions, but that would mean that I have to pretend like both sides of that particular issue have merit and applaud my students for simply taking a position if they so choose-- even if their position is bigoted.  &quot;Open your copy of Mockingbird to page 45,&quot; she said, feeling not unlike a cog in a hypocritical machine.

Hi Mose.  Cool blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year I taught Tom Sawyer to my 8th grade LA/SS classes.  One of the most obv. themes is the hypocrisy of social institutions.  Twain satirizes the church, medicine, law and schools&#8211; drawing attention in a uniquely pedantic, insanely boring chapter that drones on and on detailing the curriculum of the particular 19th cent. small town school.  You read the chapter and think, where the hell did that come from? and what does it have to do with the adventurous lives of these little guys?  Then it dawns on you that, in all his cleverness, Twain&#8217;s point is just that.  We as a class laugh at the chapter, feel sorry for those poor kids and their anachronistic schooling.  And as an enthusiastic second year teacher myself, I have to ask myself how much things have truly changed in the 150+yrs since &#8230;Moreover, I wonder if I&#8217;m teaching the concept of hypocrisy while simultaneously highlighting my own.  </p>
<p>Next week we begin To Kill a Mockingbird and the US Constitution and I plan to bring the issue of gay marriage into the discussion.  But I, in my capacity as a teacher, am essentially not allowed to comment directly on the obvious bigotry and (in my mind) unconstitutionality of One Man One Woman (OR)/Prop 8 (CA)&#8230;  Yes, I can draw parallels and lead them to draw their own conclusions, but that would mean that I have to pretend like both sides of that particular issue have merit and applaud my students for simply taking a position if they so choose&#8211; even if their position is bigoted.  &#8220;Open your copy of Mockingbird to page 45,&#8221; she said, feeling not unlike a cog in a hypocritical machine.</p>
<p>Hi Mose.  Cool blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Downs</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynne Downs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no solution to your question. Imagination in children is something that must be  valued and nurtured by adults in the lives of children long before that child reaches his or her first classroom.  I can tell you that, as a developmental English teacher in a community college, I struggle also in my classes to ignite their passions, to have them consider what excites them and those things about which they care deeply.  Many students when they reach college have no sense of their value as individuals, and thus no concept of their potential both as an individual and as a contributing member of society. It just may be that as our society has prospered materialistically and technologically (and this is the debate after all) we have generally abandoned the concept of our children as having great worth--as our most valuable asset, and they realize this.  It truly &quot;takes a village&quot;--however we no longer value the village either...Generally, the task of convincing students of their potential then has mainly fallen on teachers. This is the question I ask myself constantly...am I up to the task?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no solution to your question. Imagination in children is something that must be  valued and nurtured by adults in the lives of children long before that child reaches his or her first classroom.  I can tell you that, as a developmental English teacher in a community college, I struggle also in my classes to ignite their passions, to have them consider what excites them and those things about which they care deeply.  Many students when they reach college have no sense of their value as individuals, and thus no concept of their potential both as an individual and as a contributing member of society. It just may be that as our society has prospered materialistically and technologically (and this is the debate after all) we have generally abandoned the concept of our children as having great worth&#8211;as our most valuable asset, and they realize this.  It truly &#8220;takes a village&#8221;&#8211;however we no longer value the village either&#8230;Generally, the task of convincing students of their potential then has mainly fallen on teachers. This is the question I ask myself constantly&#8230;am I up to the task?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think every teacher has felt this very same frustration when teaching students. Don&#039;t the students understand how important it is for them to learn this? But you bring up an interesting point...maybe not only do they not understand the importance of what we are teaching, maybe they are the ones that are right. Perhaps what we are teaching is just NOT that important.

In this environment of high stakes testing, we are certainly returning to a undesirable test-prep focused way of instructing. Not only does this discourage critical thinking, personal development, and learning engagement...it also negates any unique skills, interests, and knowledge that our students bring to with them to our classroom. 

We as teachers need the room to help our students develop these qualities rather than their ability to take a test on information of little relevance to their lives and experiences. To do this, we do need to analyze the social motivations and implications behind the current school design. It amazes me that there is NO discussion of this in any debates regarding NCLB. Instead, even the Obama administration is too focused on the surface level flaws of NCLB. We certainly need drastic changes in the way that we view education if we would like to see a more motivated and engaged student population. 

If you are interested in reading those who are discussing change in the current school design look into the work of Michael Apple, Giroux, and Hursch. There are also many &#039;Marxists&#039; out there in the field of education that have some interesting views on this matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think every teacher has felt this very same frustration when teaching students. Don&#8217;t the students understand how important it is for them to learn this? But you bring up an interesting point&#8230;maybe not only do they not understand the importance of what we are teaching, maybe they are the ones that are right. Perhaps what we are teaching is just NOT that important.</p>
<p>In this environment of high stakes testing, we are certainly returning to a undesirable test-prep focused way of instructing. Not only does this discourage critical thinking, personal development, and learning engagement&#8230;it also negates any unique skills, interests, and knowledge that our students bring to with them to our classroom. </p>
<p>We as teachers need the room to help our students develop these qualities rather than their ability to take a test on information of little relevance to their lives and experiences. To do this, we do need to analyze the social motivations and implications behind the current school design. It amazes me that there is NO discussion of this in any debates regarding NCLB. Instead, even the Obama administration is too focused on the surface level flaws of NCLB. We certainly need drastic changes in the way that we view education if we would like to see a more motivated and engaged student population. </p>
<p>If you are interested in reading those who are discussing change in the current school design look into the work of Michael Apple, Giroux, and Hursch. There are also many &#8216;Marxists&#8217; out there in the field of education that have some interesting views on this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://teacherrevised.org/2009/03/25/dispatches-from-a-second-year-teacher-part-one/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teacherrevised.org/?p=173#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny (sad) story: There&#039;s a game I play in the dance classes I teach where we reach up into the sky and pull down a star. I decided to play the game with my 2nd graders in Oakland and after we jumped up into the sky to grab the star, I had a number of students look at me with distress and say &quot;I didn&#039;t get one.&quot; 

They failed at a game that involved only their imaginations. Maybe they were trying to sabotage my game, but either way it&#039;s sad that so many of those students expect to fail even when they don&#039;t have to and also that they&#039;re more comfortable solving multiple choice, test-prep problems than they are using their imaginations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny (sad) story: There&#8217;s a game I play in the dance classes I teach where we reach up into the sky and pull down a star. I decided to play the game with my 2nd graders in Oakland and after we jumped up into the sky to grab the star, I had a number of students look at me with distress and say &#8220;I didn&#8217;t get one.&#8221; </p>
<p>They failed at a game that involved only their imaginations. Maybe they were trying to sabotage my game, but either way it&#8217;s sad that so many of those students expect to fail even when they don&#8217;t have to and also that they&#8217;re more comfortable solving multiple choice, test-prep problems than they are using their imaginations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

