One Way To Get A Class Discussion Going: Offend Them

by DAVID PAUL KLEINMAN

“Do you know why I’m calling?”

“No sir, I do not.”

“There’s been a complaint.”

“A complaint?”

“Yes, and while it isn’t a formal complaint, I just need to follow up to make sure our classrooms are. . .um. . .um. . .safe.”

“Safe?”

My first conversation with the English department chair went forty-five minutes. A parent had called the Vice President of the college and demanded to know “what sort of Commonwealth institution would hire one of these liberals—a Kleinman, no less—who speaks of ‘alternative lifestyles’ like there’s nothing wrong being homosexual!?”

I had been a teacher for six days.

The first day of Freshman Comp, with my chest, head, and stomach squealing a chord of pain, I stutteringly explained who I was, why I didn’t have a syllabus, why I hadn’t read either of the textbooks, why there were stains running from my armpits down the creases of the shirt I had obviously just bought at JC Penny, and why Charles Bukowski and Philip K. Dick are the two greatest writers ever.

They looked at me as if I had just given them a detailed explanation of every rash I had ever had.

I glanced down at my notebook. Two words were written: introduction, discussion. I’ll just go in there and wing it, I had thought. I continued, unsure, “Does anyone know who Hunter S. Thompson was? No? No? Well, he was another important writer, still is, though he took his own life a couple years back. He wrote a lot about politics, and one of the best ideas he had was this: ‘All politicians are liars.’ It is my belief you cannot understand politics without this precept. That said, George W. Bush is the worst president of my lifetime.”

Ah, ha, this would get a rise out of them. They would shake their fists in fury and spout ready-made talking points they heard at the dinner table each night. A few would storm out, their comfort zones blown to Shinola by my free-thinking. A couple of students raised their hands.

“Yeah, I don’t really know why we are in Iraq, and he doesn’t seemed to have done anything he promised to.” The class nodded their heads in agreement. Their eyes, semi-bright for a second, once again glazed over. What? Every single one of my neighbors still had a W: He’s the President bumper sticker. I had almost come to fisticuffs with a guy in a bar over women’s rights. My friends thought I was a Communist because I voted for Obama in the Illinois senate race. Virginia sure seemed like Bush country in the five months I had been living there. Why didn’t my students care?

I stumbled. I stalled. I despaired. Each face worked on its version of bored senseless. The day before I had learned it was best to not talk about music unless I wanted to hear Jay Z lyrics spouted by a redneck wearing a camouflage hat tilted to the side.

It’s not like our writer was trying to get his students to kiss…

Then it came to me, the golden goose of controversy: “I also think homosexuals should have the right to marry.” Did somebody order a ton of bricks for English 111? They sat up. They squirmed. They fidgeted. Their chairs squeaked and peeped. I embraced their outrage: “I don’t see what business it is of mine what other people do in their bedroom. It’s either a free country, or it isn’t.  You can’t decide it’s free for some people and not for others.” Twenty-five eighteen-year-olds exasperated collectively.

“Homosexuality is a sin, a disgusting sin. It’s wrong, just wrong.”

I found it difficult to not call them bigots, but we were having a lively discussion. Their thoughts were typical, but this felt good.  I was moderating. I was facilitating. I was teaching! I was doing what so many of my teachers had failed to do. I was making class interesting.

The rest of the hour ran smooth. We were almost out of time, and some points were being made about the social stigma of being seen with homosexual parents, when a heretofore silent young man raised his hand. “I don’t know, when I’m out to dinner or at the movies with my two moms, it’s no big deal. I’d rather be with them then my dad. He’s an embarrassment. He’s always drunk.”

The wind fled the room. It was hard to hide my grin. “OK, for next class, I want all of you to write an essay in support of gay marriage.” Shock, awe, and horror registered beneath the baseball caps and scrunchies.

“You are dismissed.”

When they returned for the next class, seemingly excited about what was going to come now, my anxiety faded. We spent the hour discussing Free Speech. I have them write another, yes, another essay presenting the point of view that all speech not in line with church and government doctrine should be censored.

The student whose father called the Vice President of the college writes the best paper each time, but with a disclaimer on the first that reads “This paper was written as an exercise in argument and does not represent the views of its author.”

She earns an “A,” and takes another class from me in the spring.

Come back tomorrow for the second half of this essay. The author teaches writing in Virginia.

Advertisement

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

6 Responses to One Way To Get A Class Discussion Going: Offend Them

  1. Zach

    Sounds like the Glenn Beck school of pedagogy.

    Guess I’d be more interested if it seemed like the writer had more of a purpose here than simply a desire to wow them with his free thinking.

    Anyway, I really hope this blog maintains its focus on K-12 teachers. This post feels out of place. Probably won’t read part 2.

    • David Paul Kleinman

      I disagree with your glib comment. Yes, Glen Beck’s M.O. is “scare ‘em, and scare ‘em good.” Yes, proclaiming homosexuals have the right to marry scares bigots, but the similarities stop there. Labeling what I was doing after only being a teacher for three days as “pedagogy” stretches the truth even further then Mr. Beck would. It is clear I had no idea what I’m doing and *was* scared shitless. The term “pedagogy” implies a careful and studied approach to teaching.

      Beck as well as his clones on the left like Olbermann make no attempt to disrupt the deep-seeded views of their audience. I have made Liberal classes sing the praises of the free market and the Second Amendment, quoting from Ayn Rand liberally. One of my jobs is to get my kids to question what they hold certain. In fact, I now do an exercise in which they write down their “Five Noble Truths about Life, the Universe, and Everything.” They then write “Everything I know is wrong,” and set to dismantling their own belief system. So no matter what they believe, they are forced to doubt it.

      Please forgive me, but I think I am justified in making one snarky comment if I’m compared to Glen Beck: Perhaps if K-12 teachers didn’t create such mediocre zombies, I wouldn’t have to go to such measures to get them thinking when they get to me in thirteenth grade.

      • Zach

        I just didn’t think your post had enough depth to it. Sorry to offend with the Glen Beck jab—perhaps the joke touched a nerve for a reason.

        And what “measures” are you talking about? You seem like you’re on the way to being a good teacher, David, but not in an unconventional kind of way. Getting students to challenge their belief systems is something that good K-12 teachers do everyday. You seem like you want a pat on the back. And, I think, that’s mostly what repelled me from what you had to say.

        • David Paul Kleinman

          Zach

          Sorry I’m not deep enough for you, but I will honestly take the words of one of my mentors, and National Book Award Winning author, over yours:

          Teaching has always been satisfying in the extreme and exasperating. “Good” classes almost run themselves, and bad classes are all punishment. Now that I’m back teaching–albeit only 2 classes (I’m now the Writer in Rez at A&M)–the young writers seem surprised and relieved to hear that they can write (and make live!) anything that comes into their heads. This is A&M, a very conservative campus to say the least, and I’ve got into the habit for a first class session to come in the room, sit down with a pile of books, and say, “I”m the guy your parents warned you about. I drink and smoke and swear, and (trust me) I ain’t fuckin’ giving it up for you.” Keep up the good work, David.

          If you cannot see how comparing someone to Glen Beck in a flippant manner is puerile, then I shall call you Hitler Puppy-Rapist.

          • Zach

            Puerile but effective, I guess. Sheesh. Lighten up, man. Ol’ Hank Chinaski is rolling over in his grave right now.

            I do like your class intro, by the way.

  2. J.

    Zach, I disagree. The writer engaged the class and got them thinking. For a lot of kids, K-12 proved to be a mind numbing experience. If they can emerge from their apathy, (learn only what’s on the test, obsess over grades rather than intellectual inquiry), I say this writer has done a yeoman’s job.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s