by CHRIS BACON
Working at a private English academy in South Korea consistently highlights the benefits and pitfalls of education as a business. Though such a system has its ups and downs, one particular “up” is that to survive, a business must guarantee a quality product. In educational terms, this means fostering awesome teachers. One particular means to this end involves a little black globe on the ceiling. It’s a method I would have decried two years ago, but swear by today: cameras in the classroom, recording 24/7.
On the first day in such a classroom, my mind jumped (as would most others’ reading this) straight to George Orwell’s 1984—Big Brother is watching you. The veteran instructors, though, never batted an eyelash at the idea, forgetting that it wasn’t normal everywhere. I soon discovered, to my ultimate surprise, that I thrived through, even enjoyed, the feedback classroom cameras afforded me as a teacher. Today, being responsible for watching these videos to constructively evaluate our teachers has only deepened my confidence in their effectiveness.
Take a moment to imagine a basketball team, the coach of which only gets a printout of the players’ stats, never having witnessed a game. “Johnson,” he would say, “looks like your free throws are way below average. What’s the deal?” Johnson would defend himself, saying that he was doing his best in the circumstances. “Right,” replies the coach “now I respect your right to privacy and autonomy on the court, so I’m still not actually going to watch you play. But try to step up your game a bit—these stats will make our sponsors nervous. Now get out there and cream ‘em boys!”
Of course, this is ridiculous. In reality, an attentive coach would see that Johnson cocks his elbow out too far while shooting, point that out to him, and Johnson would hit nothing but net for the rest of the season. However, this “blinded coach” method is precisely how many schools evaluate their teachers: “Our standardized test results are down. Teachers need to get them higher… somehow.” Meetings ensue. Theories are theorized. Incentives, and more often punishments, go into effect, all without anyone ever watching the game.
Contrary to the Big Brother neurosis, when a class is recorded, no one pours over it for subversive, anti-government content. In fact, most evaluation is based on presentation rather than content. Watch any recording of any class, and you will find that a lot of what makes a teacher effective can be seen in the first five minutes—energy, preparation, professionalism, and interest in the students. As it turns out, our students already do this: In the book, Blink, Malcolm Gladwell cites a study in which students watched full videos of classes and were asked to rate the teacher. Students could easily separate the “effective” (caring, interested, knowledgeable) teachers from the “ineffective.” The surprise came when another group of students watched five minutes of the classes, and judged the teachers with the same accuracy. Yet another group was able to identify the teachers who would excel just as easily, having watched one minute of a class—on mute.
I’m not suggesting teachers be evaluated through one minute silent videos, but it does demonstrate that there is no complex, scientific formula for what makes an effective teacher. If students can make the call within such constraints, there’s no reason that experienced educational professionals can’t easily identify star teachers and help struggling teachers learn from them.
As far as teacher evaluation, personally, I would much rather be judged by my performance and engagement in the classroom (things I can control, adapt, and improve on) than by the multitude of compounding variables that influence things like my students’ test scores. However, I only highlight teacher evaluation as it is a hot issue in many districts today. The benefits of classroom cameras actually extend far beyond evaluation, and in practice, are tools for our instructors more than anything else. Most often, teachers will approach me after having difficulty with particular class or aspect of the program and ask me to check out the video and share some ideas.
(By the way, I don’t think I need to point out that a randomly selected video depicts a substantially more realistic environment than that joke of an evaluation in which the principal sits in on a class, or the other farce in which a tripod camera is set up for one day—talk about an angelic transformation—students and teachers alike!)
The most profound effect, though, comes when teachers view their own classes for themselves. As many film actors will attest, there are cringes at first, but the self-realization that comes from observing oneself in action is priceless. One of our teachers recently had a class that got uncharacteristically rowdy during a certain class component. The teacher and I viewed the video together to come up with some strategies to keep them under control. The teacher quickly pointed out, however, that throughout the exercise (which was a rather difficult grammar component, unfamiliar to native speakers), she had her nose buried in the book to keep track of the next step. It was simply the lack of eye contact that allowed a bit of unchecked mischief to unravel into rowdiness. The next day, the teacher spent more time familiarizing herself with the material, kept an eye on the students while engaging them, and the situation remedied itself. Through the videos one finds that a lion’s share of classroom issues are quite simple to rectify. Just like Johnson’s rouge elbow, however, you have to see the game to catch them (Students, by the way, can engage in this self-realization as well, watching their own aberrant class behaviors, and if you want to play really dirty, “Well Mrs. Kim, let’s see why Johnny’s attention grades are indeed so low… Ah, yes that is his glue bottle in his mouth there….”)
Some branches of our academy even use the videos for team-building and idea sharing. New teachers pair with veteran partners and they each spend an hour or so a week watching the other’s class. The new teacher gets to witness a well-functioning classroom, and more often then not, the veteran teacher spends less time giving pointers and more time noting innovative techniques the greenhorn has brought to the game. A budding opera singer doesn’t flourish by simply reading books by the greats, she watches them in their element and absorbs every detail—the same can be said about the craft of a great teacher.
As with any innovation, people will make excuses as to why classroom cameras aren’t feasible. Cost is a favorite. Private academies, admittedly, can afford a semi-sophisticated video system (which, in itself, is another argument for the idea—businesses don’t invest money into something that doesn’t provide ample returns), but we’re not burning high-resolution blue-ray DVD’s here. The audio and grainy video from a simple webcam, mounted on a teachers’ computer is all you need. If anything, simply circumvent school-wide implementation and try it for yourself. Borrow a webcam for a day, have one of your techno-genius students set it up to record (heck, they could probably do all this with a used cell phone) and view your class for your own personal and professional development (Note: If this activity sounds or is boring for you, it’s good to realize that your students go through this five days a week. If the material doesn’t even hold your attention, give the kids a break). Ultimately, the personal camera idea serves as a good kick in the pants on days when I’m dragging: “Would I want to watch my own class right now? What would I do differently if I knew someone was watching… Wait… 24 people ARE watching… every day! Step it up Chris!”
More often than not, the only real obstacle to implementing this system is our own reluctance or paranoia. But why shouldn’t we want to show off our skills? Why, as educators, can we not display our craft as proudly as an NBA player on national television? Why shouldn’t we be confident enough to say that anyone can flip on our video at any moment of any day, and find something magical in the works? We are, after all, already in the major-leagues of professional education. In our line of work, however, neglecting to remedy those botched free throws will ultimately affect much more than our own stats for the season.
Chris Bacon teaches English in Korea.



Then let’s attach a camera to the principal, too. And in every cop car. And every doctor. And in every CEO’s office. A system based on complete and total transparency. And no trust.
Wow, Alistair, I’m really surprised by your response to this.
I don’t think this essay is advocating cameras as an evaluation tool in terms of hiring/firing, or as something for public consumption. Have you ever seen a tape of yourself teaching? If so, did it help? If not, you think it might?
I’ll try it if you will.
One thing this essay got me to do was at least picture myself teaching. I had a horrible class on Monday. When I reflect, I realize that I did a lot of teaching sitting down (in a desk, as part of the circle.) Today I will stand and walk around more. I bet the students will be more engaged. But this is something that probably would have been obvious to me if I had reviewed a tape of my classroom. And who knows what else I’m missing?
That said, I definitely feel where you’re coming from. It’s one thing to say that a camera is used only for actually improving teaching and teaching styles. But reality has a way of being very different, especially when the tapes end up in the hands of principals, HR people, media, parents, etc.
- Jesse
No, I didn’t think the essay was advocating for that. I just don’t like the idea that teachers should need a camera 24/7 to give them the kick in the pants the writer describes. I do think video is great way to learn about yourself as a teacher. My mentor filmed me a few times during my first year and it was wildly helpful—the biggest surprise was that I actually looked like a teacher (when I felt like a 24 year old kid). And I would totally be open to that process again if, as Nessa mentions below, the school was kept out of the process. But, unfortunately, experience has taught me not to trust the school in those matters. But I’m glad Chris wrote about this issue, and from such a unique perspective—teacher evaluation is such a contested issue. Teachers, especially veteran ones, clam up as soon as the subject comes up. They oppose any and all new methods of evaluation.
Didn’t mean for my original response to feel so terse (if it did).
I’m with Alistair. It feels very much Big Brother, no matter how you slice it. Sure, I think performers should have a chance to evaluate themselves in action. But watch out, America. You don’t want this, it can and will be used against you.
Ssshhh, don’t give Michele Rhee in DC any ideas.
And I’m not even a teacher, unless you count my substitute work. I’m a parent and I’d love to know what’s going on in the classroom. The only advantage I can see for me here is that if I was ever given access, I could pick any random day and get a better feel for what goes on in my child’s classroom, than if I just dropped in announced.
I really liked your piece Chris. I don’t necessarily think the school should be part of this process (and definitely not be owners of the tapes) but it is so useful for teachers that are really engaging in reflective practices. Thanks for the reminder that it’s not so hard to do!
Despite my advocacy for personal and individual rights and freedoms, there should be a camera in every classroom, hallway and bus- period. This will aid both students and teachers alike in accepting responsiblity for their own actions, allow parents to observe behaviors in their children of which they may be in complete denial, and allow teachers and administrators to evaluate their own effectiveness as far as teaching strategies, classroom management and administrative policies.
Thanks for all of the ideas! Alistair and others bring up the really good point that trust really is an essential component. Mostly, it’s about trust that the cameras are not there to nitpick or “bust” anybody, but as a tool for improvement, which is an indication of an extremely high degree of trust between teachers and evaluators, not the opposite.
Just like any tool though, it can be misused. It’s important to note, though, that cameras in the classroom are not the CAUSE of that mistrust. Rather, their abuse would be the symptom of a deeper problem of a low-trust atmosphere where teachers and administrators are viewed as enemies on two different sides (an unfortunately common situation that deserves a separate discussion). In such an atmosphere, cameras could potentially do more harm than good.
Either way, as other commenters have advocated, video recording is still useful for personal viewing, or even sharing between teachers who value each others’ feedback. It’s not necessary to involve the whole school.
I’m interested to hear more ideas, especially if anyone has worked in a system where video evaluation was used. Like I said, the idea always sounds creepy at first (a skepticism with which many new ideas are met as Alistair pointed out), so it’s easy to speculate about how awful it could be, but my experience with the actual implementation has been positive. I’m curious to see if anyone has had worked in a similar situation with positive or negative results.
If the film was for your eyes only, that would be the case.